I'm starting a consulting side business and have no idea what hourly rate to set. I've got about 8 years of experience in my field, but this is my first time going independent. Should I match what established firms charge, or undercut them to build a client base?
You've got real leverage here that the earlier answers gloss over - 8 years means you're not actually "new," you're just independent, and clients will pay for that track record if you frame it right. I'd avoid the undercut trap entirely and instead charge within 10-20% of what established firms ask, then use your first few clients to prove you deliver the same results faster or with more personal attention, which justifies your rate going forward.
Start by researching what established consulting firms in your area actually charge for similar work - not what they advertise, but what clients are genuinely paying - then price yourself somewhere in that range rather than undercut, because undercutting signals inexperience and trains clients to expect cheap rates you'll struggle to raise later. You've got solid experience behind you, so you're not some fresh startup; the real differentiator is reliability and results, not a lower price tag. If you're worried about landing initial clients, focus on delivering exceptional work for your first few to build testimonials and referrals, rather than racing to the bottom on rates.
The gap between new and established consultants isn't always about undercutting - it's often about scope and risk. You could keep rates competitive with bigger firms but clarify what clients get: maybe you're more hands-on, faster turnaround, or available for smaller projects they won't touch. New doesn't mean cheap, it means different. That said, honestly assess whether you can afford to take a lower rate while building reputation and referrals, because once clients lock in a price they're reluctant to see it climb later.
Pricing yourself too low actually kills your credibility - clients often assume cheaper means less experienced, so you might attract the wrong type of work anyway! With 8 years under your belt you've got real value, so I'd aim for maybe 80-90% of what established firms charge rather than undercut heavily, then let your faster turnaround and personalized attention be the actual selling point.
most consultants i know who went independent made the mistake of anchoring to what they *think* firms charge instead of actually asking recent clients what they paid - that gap is usually way bigger than you'd guess. with 8 years of experience you're not really new, so don't fall into the trap of underpricing to "build credibility"; clients see low rates as a red flag, not a bargain. instead, charge within 10-20% of what established firms do in your area, but be upfront about what makes you different - faster turnaround, direct access to you, flexibility, whatever's true - and let that justify the rate. the risk of undercutting is you'll spend a year or two stuck servicing cheap clients before you can raise prices without losing them.
One thing nobody mentions is that your first clients will often become your best reference, so it's worth asking yourself whether you'd rather have three clients paying full rate or ten paying half - because the cheap ones rarely stick around or refer anyone. If you're genuinely worried about landing work early on, a better move might be offering a discounted rate for a specific commitment period (like "introductory pricing for the first 3 months") rather than permanently underselling yourself.
Log into answer.
