2 answers
★ Best answer
In practice, most active traders underperform index funds even without accounting for commissions and taxes - it's a statistically proven fact. But the main thing people often miss is the psychological factor. When it's your own money in the account and you're going through a drawdown, it's way harder to resist panic than it is to keep a diversified portfolio on autopilot.
If you've got the time, the drive, and nerves of steel to follow quotes every single day - maybe you're one of those rare professionals. But the odds of that aren't higher than five percent, probably. For everyone else, an index fund is an honest choice that just takes less emotional effort and delivers steady results.
The thing is, "more profit" isn't quite the right angle. Index funds and active trading solve different problems, and comparing them by one criterion is like asking whether a bicycle is better than a bus. Index funds are about long-term steady accumulation: you put money in and basically leave it alone for years, earning returns from overall market growth. Active trading is about trying to make money on price swings by getting in and out of positions quickly.
The statistics show that most active traders end up making less than people who just hold index funds. Because commissions, taxes, calculation errors, and just the psychology of it all work against the trader. You have to constantly analyze, make decisions, and in stressful moments people often act emotionally. Plus even professional traders don't always beat the market.
If you're new to this, index funds give you steady results without much knowledge or time commitment. If you're willing to spend months learning, constantly monitor the market, take risks, and stress over drawdowns - maybe trading will give you the thrill. But nobody can promise you bigger profits.
Your answer
Log into answer.