3 answers
Skipping breakfast doesn't automatically ruin weight loss, but it often backfires because people end up hungrier later and make worse food choices or overeat at lunch. Some folks do fine fasting until noon, while others find they have way less energy and end up snacking more throughout the day. What matters most is your total calorie intake and whether you can actually stick to it - if skipping breakfast makes you miserable and derails your eating habits, it's not worth it for you.
I've noticed the real issue comes down to individual metabolism and what you actually eat when you do sit down - some people genuinely aren't hungry in the morning and do fine skipping it, while others (like me) get so ravenous by mid-afternoon that skipping breakfast ends up costing them more calories overall through snacking and larger portions. The previous answer nailed the backfire effect, so I'd just add that it matters way more whether you're eating whole foods or junk when hunger finally hits than whether breakfast itself happened.
Don't assume that skipping breakfast is automatically a problem or a solution - it really depends on your specific hunger patterns and energy levels throughout the day. The pitfall people often miss is that it's not just about *when* you eat, but about whether you're actually in a calorie deficit overall; plenty of folks skip breakfast and stay in a surplus by overeating later, while others do genuinely fine without it and maintain better control. Are you finding yourself ravenous by mid-morning, or does skipping it feel natural to you? That matters more than any rule about breakfast timing.
Your answer
Log into answer.