So researchers went out to some remote atoll looking for plane debris from Amelia Earhart, which would be historic if real, but it turned out to just be a clump of trees? That's pretty embarrassing for them. Why do people keep finding 'evidence' about Earhart if most of it's just random stuff? Is there any actual chance we'll ever know what happened?
The Earhart mystery just has so much pull because her disappearance in 1937 was never solved, so people keep hoping for that breakthrough discovery - and when you're looking at remote islands with limited records, it's easy to mistake natural formations or old debris for aircraft wreckage. Most of the "evidence" that crops up over the years doesn't hold up under scrutiny, which is why expeditions often come away empty-handed or disappointed. At this point, unless someone stumbles on something pretty definitive like a confirmed piece of her plane with serial numbers, we probably won't know for certain what happened to her - decades have passed and the ocean's a massive place.
Log into answer.
