I've grabbed a few of those viral picks myself and felt the same letdown. The thing is, BookTok thrives on clips and soundbites - a five-second video of someone crying at a plot twist gets way more engagement than a nuanced discussion about character development or pacing. So what goes viral tends to be the most dramatic, most emotional moment stripped of context. When you actually sit down and read the whole book, you realize that moment might've been a small payoff in 400 pages of slower buildup, or the characters leading up to it weren't as compelling as the video made it seem.
There's also a mismatch between what BookTok celebrates and what makes a book genuinely good to read. A twist that's shocking in isolation might feel cheap in the actual narrative. A love interest who seems swoony in a highlight reel could come across as one-dimensional when you're living in that character's head for hundreds of pages. The algorithm and the format reward intensity, not depth.
You're not being picky - you're reading the whole thing instead of consuming a curated moment. That's actually the opposite of picky. The real issue is that viral recommendations are inherently filtered through what performs well on video, not what holds up as a full reading experience. It might help to check what other book communities (slower-moving ones like Goodreads discussions or book subreddits) think about the same titles. You'll get a wider range of takes beyond the hype, and you can spot which books people actually reread versus which ones people just remember for one scene.