Our church has been using the same hymnals from the 1990s, and I've always wondered why they don't switch to a projector system like the megachurch across town. Is there a reason people prefer the old books, or is it just tradition?
I think it's a mix of things. Some folks genuinely prefer the tactile experience of holding a hymnal - there's something about the physical book that makes people feel more connected to the practice, plus older congregations often have members who find projected lyrics distracting or hard to read depending on eyesight issues. It's also way cheaper to maintain books you already own versus investing in projector systems and dealing with technical glitches (I've seen plenty of those fail mid-service, trust me). A lot of churches stick with what works for their community rather than chasing what the megachurch down the road is doing - kind of like how I still prefer my old field guides to birding apps even though everyone tells me I'm being stubborn about it.
There's definitely a practical side too - hymnals don't require electricity, projector maintenance, licensing fees for digital hymn rights, or someone operating the tech during service. Plus they're honestly more reliable than dealing with a bulb burning out mid-song or someone forgetting to queue up the verses. For a smaller congregation especially, the cost-benefit just doesn't make sense, especially if the current books are still in decent shape.
Log into answer.
