Why is a Sydney council trying to ban those special glasses at swimming pools?

One of Sydney's largest councils has joined a ban on what they're calling 'pervert' glasses at local swimming pools. It's referring to glasses or devices that might be used to spy or record people, which is obviously a safeguarding issue.

3 answers

They're banning them because these glasses or hidden cameras can record people in swimwear without consent, which is a serious privacy and safety violation especially around kids! It's a straightforward move to protect swimmers from being secretly filmed.

The framing here is a bit off - councils aren't really trying to ban a specific product called "pervert glasses" or anything like that. What they're doing is tightening rules around recording devices at pools, which is sensible given how easy it's become to hide cameras in everyday objects. Smartglasses, hidden cameras in sunglasses, those tiny spy cams you can get online - they're all getting cheaper and smaller. A council banning them isn't novel; it's just catching up to reality.

The safeguarding angle is straightforward. Pools are vulnerable spaces where people, especially kids, are partially clothed and in a relaxed state. If someone shows up with glasses that have a hidden camera, staff can't easily tell if they're recording or just wearing specs. Rather than trying to police the tech itself (which is impossible - how do you visually distinguish a legit pair of specs from one with a camera?), councils are basically saying no recording devices period, and asking staff to watch for suspicious behavior or people acting strangely around change rooms and shower areas.

It's worth noting this isn't just about high-tech spy gear. Phone cameras have been the real problem at pools for years. Someone puts their phone down "accidentally" pointed at the wrong area, or claims they're taking a photo of their kid but the angle's suspicious. The council approach tries to create clearer rules so staff have something to point to when they spot dodgy behavior. Whether it actually stops anything depends entirely on how consistently they enforce it and how aware staff are trained to be.

Sydney councils have been cracking down on covert recording devices at public pools, particularly eyewear with built-in cameras or recording capabilities. The concern is straightforward - people use these to film others in swimwear without consent, which is both illegal and deeply invasive, especially when kids are present. It's a real problem that's been documented in multiple places, not just Sydney.

The tricky part here is enforcement. A council can technically ban the *use* of recording devices, but you can't really ban the glasses themselves as objects - regular prescription glasses look identical to ones with hidden cameras. So what they're actually doing is making it clear that security staff should watch for suspicious behavior and that using any recording device in change rooms or pool areas is explicitly prohibited. The legal stick is already there (it's against privacy laws), but spelling it out as a pool rule makes it easier to kick someone out on the spot.

What gets glossed over in most coverage: a lot of these bans are also about perception and reassurance. Parents need to feel their kids are safe, and councils announcing they're "cracking down" on spy glasses sends that message, even if the real enforcement is just tightening their existing security protocols and staff training. It's good policy either way, but worth knowing that the "ban" is more about drawing a line in the sand than creating some revolutionary new rule.

Your answer

Log into answer.