11 answers

★ Best answer

Steam is genuinely more effective and faster, but it depends on how you organize your day. With steam you sterilize bottles in 5-10 minutes, you take them out still warm and practically dry. The cold solution like Milton requires a minimum of 30 minutes soaking, and you have to remember to change it every day - it's not complicated but it's a habit you need to keep up. If you're in a rush in the morning or maybe you're only partially breastfeeding, steam is really convenient.

The upfront cost is higher, yes, but it's not exactly a fortune: we're talking maybe 50-70 euros difference, and a sterilizer, if you use it properly, lasts for years. The cold solution in the long run also costs money because the tablets don't cost much but you go through quite a few. That said, if you're the type who has everything organized like clockwork and don't mind doing an extra step, Milton and similar products work perfectly fine and it's not marketing. It's not like bottles sterilized cold are any less clean.

Honestly having the Chicco like you did takes away the doubt. Use it and see if the time you save is worth the expense for you. Maybe after a month you'll figure out if it's a convenience you'll really feel or just something that looks good on paper.

Both work, but it really depends on how you manage things practically. With cold sterilizers (like Milton) you have to soak the bottles for 30 minutes, then rinse them really well or you risk chlorine smell hanging around. Steam sterilizers like Chicco get them sterile in 8-10 minutes and you've got them ready right away, which is handy if you're rushing.

The real difference is in your daily routine. If you're someone who sterilizes once in the morning and that works for the whole day, cold sterilizers cost you less and work just fine. But if you're doing multiple cycles during the day and don't have the patience to wait half an hour, steam is a game changer. My advice is to look at how many bottles you're cleaning a day: if it's just a few and you've got time, Milton is solid and affordable; if it's a lot and you're actually pressed for time, steam takes the stress out. It's not just marketing hype, but it's also not essential to spend more if your home routine allows for it.

The steam one makes sense if you're the type who's always in a rush and wants to sterilize constantly throughout the day, because it's fast and convenient. With the cold method instead you need to plan a bit: you prep the bottles the evening before, let them soak overnight and by the next morning they're ready, so it works well if you can manage to stay at least somewhat organized. The thing nobody mentions is that steam over time can damage certain bottle materials (especially the silicone on the teats), while the cold solution is gentler. So it's not just marketing, but it really depends on how you live your daily routine.

One thing nobody mentions is that steam degrades the silicone and bottle valves faster, especially if you're sterilizing them every day for months: cold is gentler on that front, so if you want your bottles to last longer it's worth considering that too.

I went with steam sterilization, and honestly after the first few months of panicking I realized bottles last fine anyway - you just don't need to obsess over it and sterilize 2-3 times a day instead of every time you look at the baby. For us, convenience won out: 10 minutes and done, especially when you're exhausted and just want to get things over with quickly.

That said, if you're the type who can actually stay organized with cold sterilization (prepping in the evening, soaking overnight) you'll save a lot and your bottles will probably thank you for it. It's not pure marketing, steam is genuinely more convenient, but it's not the only solution that works either.

I would have gone with cold sterilization if I'd known earlier that steam actually wears down materials faster, especially when you're sterilizing every day like you do with a newborn. Sure, steam is convenient when you're in a rush, but honestly Milton and similar products do the same job and your bottles last longer, so in the end you're saving money that way too. The only thing is you need to have a bit of space in the kitchen for the container and a bit of patience planning ahead, but nothing dramatic.

Personally, I went with steam and I don't regret it, even though I get that cold sterilization is more economical. The real difference is that with steam you save time and space - you put the bottles in, press a button, and in 8-10 minutes they're ready, with no chemical residue to worry about. With Milton you have to find space to let them soak and remember to rinse them properly, which with a newborn when you're running on no sleep becomes a hassle. That said, if you're the type who can organize yourself well and you don't like wasting hot water or risking damage to the silicone, cold sterilization does the job just fine and the cost is way lower.

I made a bit of a mess initially because I went with steam thinking it was the right choice, then I found out it really depends on how you manage things at home. In my case, with bottles and pacifiers multiplying everywhere, steam saved my life - I sterilize in the evening and have everything ready in the morning. But I know people who sorted it out perfectly well with Milton for a third of the cost, it depends if you have the space and patience to organize yourself with soaking.

What bothers me most about steam is that it uses more electricity and makes noise, which at 6 in the morning isn't great if the little one is still sleeping. With cold sterilization instead you do the mix the evening before, throw everything you need in there and forget about it. But obviously, you need at least half an hour for the solution to work.

One thing though - other people say steam degrades the pieces faster, and it's true that after a few months of daily sterilizations the valves start to get damaged. If you're thinking of using it for a long time, cold sterilization is actually less harsh on the materials. As for marketing, steam isn't a pointless gimmick, but it's not indispensable like the ads make it seem, if you have the discipline to do the soaking. What would you do if you had to manage the bottles: are you more of a wing-it type or do you prefer to plan things?

cuoco_alessandro asker I'm more of a planner type, so Milton could work well for me. Thanks for the details, you convinced me to try the cold solution before spending more money.

What I'd really recommend you check carefully is whether the Chicco steamer you got is compatible with the specific materials of your bottles, because not all of them handle high temperatures the same way - some have parts that warp after months of heavy use. With the cold one you don't have that risk, but it's true that it requires more planning and the chlorine smell (or whatever the solution is) sticks to the bottles if you don't rinse them really well.

With steam you really risk damaging the silicones faster if you use the sterilizer every day, and cold ones like Milton keep bottles intact longer. But what nobody mentions is that you can use them together: steam when you're in a rush and need them right away, and cold the night before for overnight, so you're not just using steam all the time and you save on how long your bottles last. If your budget allows and you're often rushing around, steam makes sense, but honestly Milton costs next to nothing and it's less stressful on the plastic - it comes down to whether you prefer quick convenience or longevity.

If he likes having bottles ready to go and doesn't want to think about it, steam pays off; but if he's got the space and time to organize himself, cold sterilization (like Milton) works great and is less harsh on the rubber and valves in the long run 🍼

Your answer

Log into answer.