9 answers
It's not really about how old the game is, it's about what you actually like. New ones are usually prettier and have fresher mechanics, but they're often still rough around the edges or packed with ads and pay-to-win stuff - tried-and-tested hits are at least polished, but they can get boring. I go for both: if a new game catches my eye from the description or reviews, I'll grab it, and I keep a couple of favorites on standby in case the new one disappoints. The main thing is not to get stuck in just one game and actually try different stuff.
The main thing is not to get hung up on trends - just try new games without any bias, but be honest with yourself about whether you'll get bored with it in a week. The previous answer makes a fair point about buggy releases and pay-to-win stuff, but not all new games are like that; sometimes a proven hit is already boring and designed to squeeze money out of you way more than a fresh release. The real thing is not to be afraid to delete it if it doesn't grab you, and not to stick with old games just because you're already familiar with them.
I usually check the number of active players and reviews from the first month after launch - that's a good indicator the game won't fall apart in a week. New games really do have an advantage in visuals and freshness, but I've downloaded plenty of pretty new releases, played for a day or two, and deleted them because of aggressive monetization or bugs. Proven hits are more convenient when you know what to expect, but ultimately I choose based on my mood: if I want something completely new - I'll take the risk, if I need a chill game to unwind with - I go for a classic.
I'd second the advice about reviews and players, but there's one more thing I forgot to mention - check out the publisher and developer :) An unknown studio or a company known for aggressive monetization, even with pretty graphics, is a risk. But proven hits win not just through polish, but because the creators have already shown they're trustworthy. The ideal scenario is either a new game from a reliable publisher, or a fresh title that's been through beta and already got solid reviews at launch, without going crazy on donations.
Try combining both strategies: jump into new games, but with a specific plan. For example, install it for the weekend and give yourself 2-3 hours to test it out. If it doesn't hook you in that time, delete it without regret. And keep the proven hits as "background" games you jump into between other stuff or when you can't be bothered searching for something new.
The big thing nobody really talks about is the psychological novelty effect. A new game seems super cool those first few days just because it's new, and your brain gets a dopamine hit from the freshness. Then the effect wears off and you realize that under the shiny graphics there's just copy-pasted mechanics from five other games. The proven hits stay popular for a reason - they keep your interest longer.
And yeah, you should definitely Google the publisher before installing - if a studio's known for their games only lasting six months max or they dropped support quick, then even a pretty new game from them is potentially a dead end. But don't stress about it too much: just a quick search for early reviews after launch usually tells you whether the game's actually alive or not.
Try playing the demo or first level if it's available - you'll figure out in five minutes whether you'll be comfortable with the controls and pace, or if it's just a pretty shell. New games often have exactly this problem: they look amazing, but controlling your character is a pain or the interface is confusing. Proven hits are popular for a reason - they've already ironed out these things, and starting fresh is way more enjoyable.
Don't just rely on player count in the first month - popular new releases often lose their audience pretty quick if the developer stops caring about updates. I'd say focus less on what's trending and more on what actually appeals to you: if you like chill games about plants or puzzles, look for new ones in those genres even if they're not well-known.
The real difference between good new games and established ones isn't age - it's whether the developer is willing to keep working on it. Check if there were updates at least once every month or two after launch - that's a sign the project is being taken seriously.
I spent a long time looking for some game to just chill out with in the evenings, and I noticed an interesting pattern: new games often die right when I start getting into them. I install something fresh with nice graphics, play it for two weeks, and then the developers either freeze it or it becomes completely unplayable because of ads. Now I've stopped chasing new releases altogether and gone back to proven projects that are still supported and don't ask for money every five minutes.
I agree that the practical tip from the previous answers about reviews and publishers really helps, but I'd add a simple filter: if a game has been on the stores for three months and is actively getting updates - that's already a good sign. There's no need to rush, you can wait until it stabilizes.
I had a situation where I downloaded a trendy new game, played it for a couple days, and realized it was just a pretty shell - boring gameplay and everything was designed to make you spend money. But then I found this small game from an unknown studio that wasn't in the top charts, and it turned out to be actually interesting. I think you should focus not on how hyped a game is, but on whether the developer has other projects that people praise - if they do, chances are they know what they're doing, even if the new game hasn't racked up millions of downloads yet.
Your answer
Log into answer.